Most Frightening Thing!

I Though Jason was bad, and then I thought Willard was bad, but now the most frightening thing coming around is, YES, we all know, the election this Tuesday.. I have come to conclusion that I am going to find a nice movie, and some popcorn and ignore the election day. My advice to everyone is to curl up with a book, a movie or go camping.
This maybe be your last chance if you know what best for you.And if all else fails I have have some advice for you concerning some activities for you.

Miniature Golf: Nothing more exciting than to kick around a ball the size of some democrat’s head.

Bowling: Nothing like rolling a ball the size of some democrat’s ego.




Well you could go to a movie, the new High School Musical 3 is well worth the 7 to 8 dollars to see, rather than Obama. I give HSM3 a 5 stars rating. The Obama inforcommerial I give mimus 6 for the most boring thing on television next to "My Mother the Car" Reruns!

The best thing I can tell you is to turn off the television, go on a week day trip lasting through Wednesday and pray that the Obama the class A socialist is not elected. Because in Ali likely hood this is the last vacation most of us are going to see for the next four years! God help us all!

Obama Vs McCain a 2008 version of 1948 Dewey vs Truman

Today column is one of either hopeful optimist or resign to defeat. So you would have to take your pick! A no time in History have we seen the press and pollsters so work together to make a candidate win a election as we see in the 2008. Not since the Dewey-Truman run have we see Fluxuating polls and the Press and some blogs out to get a vice Prudential candidate as we have now.
As a historian, I study history trying to come up with trends in history. The Truman Dewey contest in 1948 was one we all can and should remember if you study your history right. Thomas Dewey the darling of the Republicans and the sitting President of the United were fighting tooth and nail for the office.
The pollsters and Press at this time had Dewey willing the election and the famous headline in the Chicago tribune read
“The Dewey Defeats Truman”. The Tribune was not the only paper to make the mistake. The Daily Journal of Commerce had eight articles in its Nov. 3 edition about what could be expected of President Dewey.

The paper's five column headline read, "Dewey Victory Seen as Mandate to Open New Era of Government-Business Harmony, Public Confidence.


"The polls, reporters, political writers - they all believed Dewey was going to win by a landslide. On September 9, 1948, Elmo Roper was so confident of a Dewey win that he announced there would be no further Roper Polls on this election. Roper said, "My whole inclination is to predict the election of Thomas E. Dewey by a heavy margin and devote my time and efforts to other things."However Truman was undaunted and believed that with a chance he would win the election.
In one poll of political journalists by Newsweek October 1, 1948 issue, Newsweek they asked “which candidate they thought would win. Appearing in the stated the results: all 50 believed Dewey would win.”

Rhodes Cook is a veteran Washington political analyst for the Wall Street Journal writes:
"There is the sense that the Illinois senator may be putting the cart before the horse, a Dewey-like affliction of presumptive victory. And there are few things more off-putting to voters than having their ballots taken for granted. To be sure, Mr. Obama has to transform himself virtually overnight from being largely unknown to a candidate widely recognized to have the credentials to be president – a difficult feat for anyone to execute.
And there are admittedly clear differences between the 2008 campaign and the Dewey-Truman contest of 1948. Mr. Dewey was already a known commodity back then, having lost the 1944 election to Franklin Roosevelt. The Republican’s dapper presence and cool public demeanor made him no favorite of the press......
Yet there are also some critical similarities between the two elections. Just as the Democrats now, the Republicans in 1948 were bullish about their chances of capturing the White House after winning control of both houses of Congress two years earlier. As in the present, the campaign of 1948 was widely viewed as a “change” election, with a significant gap in ages between the two major-party nominees. Mr. Dewey, at 46 years old (the same age as Sen. Obama, who turns 47 on Monday), represented a new generation of leaders ready to move to the fore after World War II. Mr. Truman was nearly 20 years his senior, old enough to have served with distinction in World War I as a field artillery captain"

John McCain could be the Republicans Truman? Yet we going to see changes no matter what. certainly the big lie that Obama is that "Change" is something we will have to face. He is the rock star, a Messiah, Either way we will be left holding the bag at the end of the election. This is the first time in my memory we will see a candidate win a election by proposing tax hikes as McGovern did. I will discuss what happens after this election. next week. But a hint to that article is that even if Obama wins this election, the Liberal socialist Democrats lose.
I realized I jumping from either Obama wins or McCain wins, however, I feel we are looking at a disaster either way.
2012 is coming and I do not believe Obama is going to be President. I could be wrong and I often am. I still believe that a defeat of Obama could mean a win by Hillary in 2012. I still believe McCain will win, by a slime 2000 and 2004 margin.

Could history repeating itself? We never know. Real Change is coming!

Obama and Socialism

A many weeks ago a Friend we will call Mike said, and asked me if I knew what real socialism was all about, Ie concerning my remarks that Obama was a died hard socialist. But I took from that, that maybe, just maybe he really didn’t know what one was himself. Liberal Academics are fun these days in the twisting of facts and the multilation of realities. So lets have some fun in comparing the current Obama Campaign to what we know about Socialism.

If we are to understand what Obama and the “Socialist” Democrat party want, we have to refer to the dictionary to get a definition. That is, if the socialist havn’t redefine for us: “Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state or collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and the creation of an egalitarian society.”

We can then say that some of the very changes that Obama uses as a campaign slogan are socialistic? Karl Marx wrote; “From Each According To His Ability - To Each According To His Need” seems to becoming the modern version of what has turned into a new Obama motto of : “Change” or for that matter what is consider “Fair” to the American people. Obama said that he just wanted to spread the wealth around. The exact meaning certainly seems to be obvious and that was to take from one group and give it to another. Joe the Plumber correctly phase this as Socialism, the very system that fail.

The question is: “Why should so many rich people have so much more money than soo many poor?” That certainly isn’t “Fair” is it? I mean really! His VP Candidate Joe Biden said that it was unpatriotic not rich to pay taxes. I sure that Thomas Jefferson would agree, Duh NO!
Are any number of social issues that hamper success in this country, pushing back one group over another? Modern socialism originated in the late nineteenth-century working class political movement. This obsolete system express by Karl Marx posited that socialism would be achieved via class struggle and a proletarian revolution which represents the transitional stage between capitalism and communism.

Obama seems to share the belief with modern day socialist that capitalism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital and creates an unequal society. In other words this is Obama’s very campaign slogan which he uses the word “Change” as a stepping stone to the very same Socialism. Obama advocates it seems, the creation of an egalitarian society, in which wealth and power are distributed more evenly though taxation In Obama’s platform. Another dividing feature of the socialist movement is the split on how a socialist economy should be established between the reformists and the revolutionaries. We have not heard from the democrats or Obama yet, but the very Nationalization of some of the Banks could be a step in that direction. Some socialists advocate complete nationalization of the very means of production, distribution, and exchange; while others advocate state control of capital within the framework of a market economy.


The current Market economy literally stands in the way of so-call progressive trends that Obama and other Progreives like to establish in the country. They feel that we didn’t give socialism a chance to survived? Why should we since the Socialist system has to be built on a market economy, before it wipes it out. I once asked a couple of my students if they believe that Obama was spreading Socialism and their answer was that in a way they believe he was, They saw nothing wrong with government control of a few of our industries?


Sadly, it is still express by the some who believe that "change" is something our system truly needs. But is socialism the change we ned? Obama’s fascination with this concept means we are about to experience it for ourselves if elected. My Students claim that past tries at socialism like the Soviet Union and Communist China wasn’t really socialism and more a dictatorship. They feel that Lenin Stalin and Mao perverted it and that real socialism wouldn’t have killed 60 million people as Stalin did.

Liberals and radicals claimed that this was not true socialism. Yet the Weather Underground, chief belief was that in order to established their form of socialism that they need to eliminate at least 28 million Americans who would be a distraction to achieving their goal of a socialist United States. Eliminate is such a nice word to the real word is to murder? Because in the long run it would take a Final solution to really kill the market system. This would have to be a Long, Long road to Change. But the people would have to be condition for that "Change"? Would they not? Is this conditioning occurring now with Obama?

Can it be? That one of the founding Fathers of this group hung around Barak Obama and Obama started out his campaign in his home? Obama let slip his socialist leanings to Joe the plumber when he denied he wanted to punish wealth and insisted he just wanted to spread the wealth around.

Yet Many Americans along with Joe just could not understand Obama’s cavalier attitude toward the American dream.
Democratic commentator Bob Beckel was dismissive of the significance of Obama's outright nod to socialism, saying we've had a progressive tax system since the income tax was initiated.

But what Beckel did not explain is that at least in those days, the stated purpose of the income tax system was to fund government services, not to redistribute wealth.
Is it to hard for people in this country to understand that the Obama and Democrats are not being Progressive, but regressive. To even look to a fail system of government, can’t be label progressive in any real stretch of the imagination. Yes I said the word Socialism. We in this country are about to discover what it really means. Yes Mike, I think I know what it means, and like Joe the Plumber it frightens the hell out of me. God help us!

Is Obama repeating Presidents Hoover's and FDR's mistakes?

From the Anonymous Contributor


Are we about to repeat the tragic mistakes Presidents Hoover and FDR made that created the Great Depression?

Hoover was president when the Depression started in 1929. FDR was elected president in 1932 because Hoover's actions made the Depression worse. FDR's subsequent actions also made it worse by prolonging the depression, eventually resulting in a "recession within a depression" from 1937-8, almost 10 years after the initial crash. The beginning of the end started in when the US entered WW II (1941). The economics of the war was the only thing that ended The Great Depression. None of Hoover's or FDR's remedies ended it, but instead made the Depression longer and harder, turning a normal short term repression into a terrible 12+ year depression.

Is history repeating itself right before our eyes?

It appears so.

Obama modeled his economic platform after Hoover's and FDR's most disastrous policies.

Hoover implemented the catastrophic Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act which worsened the depression by seriously reducing international trade and causing retaliatory tariffs in other countries. US exports fell causing prices to fall and Americans to loose income. Hardest hit were farm commodities such as wheat, cotton, tobacco, and lumber, causing many American farmers to default on their loans, leading to the bank runs on small rural banks that characterized the early years of the Great Depression

Failing to learn from Hoover's disastrous mistakes, Obama and the Democrat Congress promise to pursue the same protectionist impulse by "renegotiating" the NAFTA trade agreement to "protect" American workers. This means that free trade will not be so free anymore, which will, again, cause other countries (e.g, Canada and Mexico) to retaliate to "protect" their citizens.

Have we learned nothing?

FDR was an excellent speaker that projected a calm persona, a "progressive" wealthy man who assailed the wealthy. He and the Democrats of the era were fascinated with the great socialist, communist and fascist experiments countries like Russia, Germany and France were undertaking. These were new and exciting ideas on how to solve real problems: even some conservatives were intrigued. As the president over a downtrodden and hurting people, FDR was excited to actually have the opportunity to try his hand at such socialistic grand experiments in American, believing it a moral and patriotic experiment to solve our country's ills.

FDR primarily blamed the excesses of big business for causing an unstable bubble-like economy. Democrats believed the problem was that business had too much money, and the New Deal was intended as a remedy, by empowering labor unions and farmers and by raising taxes. FDR lambasted "trickle down" economics, extolled "trickle up" economics and pit the middle class against "the rich", raised their taxes in order to provide a "more equitable opportunity to share in the distribution of national wealth... [in] The New Deal...." FDR comprehensively restructured the economy and Wall Street. FDR left us with huge new social programs that are still on the books, the cost and size of which have spiraled out of control ever since.

Today, Obama, exactly mirrors everything above.

He believes socialism works and wants to conduct even more experiments to see if he can solve our ills with "progressive" programs like national healthcare. He's an excellent speaker projecting a calm persona, that blames his own class, "the rich" and "big business" for the economic crisis, promises to raise taxes to "spread the wealth around", wants to strengthen labor unions, wants significant regulatory power to comprehensively restructure the economy and Wall Street, create some form of the WPA style work programs, lambasts "failed trickle down" economics, extolls "growing the economy from bottom up" and callously plays "middle" vs "rich" class warfare. He wants to permanently add significant new social programs to our government, the cost and size of which will once again balloon far beyond his already overly expensive initial proposals. Just as FDR, he and his running mate believes it to be morally "patriotic" to be forced to pay higher taxes on behalf of the greater good.

Have we learned nothing?

Americans were hurting and afraid during the Great Depression. They put their trust in saviors who only hurt them more. Theirs turned out to be a false hope. Hoover's and FDR's policies turned a recession into a 12+ year depression that was only fixed by a wartime economy. Their kind of socialism doesn't work.

Will Obama's recycling of failed Hoover & FDR policies lead us straight into another bleak era in our history? Obama appears to be pursing that same policies and same kind of radical socialism they mistakenly believed in. He modeled his campaign and economic platform after FDR's disastrous policies and includes some of the most disastrous Hoover policies. Is Obama the answer or just another FDR socialist that will give us programs that won't help and that we can't afford?

Making matters worse is the fact the far left triaxial government of President Obama, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid would possess an absolute lock on Congress and the White House, with absolutely nobody able to oppose their far, far left agendas. Pelosi and Reid are far more reckless and ideological than Obama. Together they will have free, unopposed, reign and absolute power to enact any and all normal and socialist agendas they desire.

Are we again allowing our emotions and need to be rescued from our troubles to overpower our intellect and good judgement?

Have we learned nothing?

This is most definitely NOT your run-of-the-mill Democrat v. Republican election.

This is a significantly transformative turning point in our future that we dare not take lightly.

We must be sure that we know exactly what we're doing and where we're going. If we fail, we will suffer the immediate consequences, starting next year. Our grandchildren will labor under much larger tax burdens to fund the Next Great Ociety we build for ourselves.

If we absolutely must vote for Obama, we should at least provide a counter balance in Congress and demand that he refute his plans to again employ the programs and policies that led to so much misery during the Great Depression.

Do we once again permanently increase that failed dependency of socialism in our country or do we revitalize that same spirit of American Exceptionalism that our country was founded on and made it great?

Have we learned nothing?

Glenn Beck on Fox News: Coming this Spring!

Blow me away, for the last two years I been watching the Glenn Beck TV program on CNN Headline News, Something by the way that puzzles me when today I turned on to se him and dog gone it Lou Dobbs was on. Lou is not Glenn in any stretch of the Imagination. But Glenn Beck is a original and great broadcaster.
His commentaries have upset Hispanic groups, Arab-American organizations and the liberal Media Matters for America which please me no end, He will going to Fox New and will host a 5 p.m. weekday program as well as a weekend show in a multi-year deal that starts next spring.

“I’m not surprised to see him go because it always seems like he fit in well with the other Fox people instead of with Headline News,” said Alan Breznick, an analyst with Heavy Reading, a media and telecommunications research firm based in New York. “I think (CNN) wanted character, but they didn’t necessarily want conservative ideologies.”


So good news for us conservatives Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly and then Sean Hannity, Oh I have to mention Alan Colmes! Nope don't have too! Only wish he would be on sooner for Elections!

Generated Crisis!

Joe Biden warned that America's enemies would test Barack Obama with an international crisis within six months if he's elected president - a shocking comment John McCain eagerly pounced on yesterday to claim Obama isn't ready to be commander-in-chief.

A: “generated crisis”! In other words a generated Terrorist attack on this country. One we have not experience since 9-11- 2001. Of course the generated Crisis that happen to Bush was supposedly by radical democrats generated by us? What a bunch of nuts.

So I asked you what else did Plagiarism Joe Have to say, That NBC New will not release? Being that NBC News is in the tank for oh Obama?

Since Plagiarism Joe believes that we will have a attack if Obama is elected, then why in heaven’s name do so? This is one of the most political big mistakes that Biden has made.

John McCain said of Biden's remarks: "The next president won't have time to get used to the office. We face many challenges here at home and many enemies abroad in this dangerous world," McCain said. "We don't want a president who invites 'testing' from the world at a time when our economy is in crisis and Americans are already fighting two wars."

McCain said it was even "more troubling" that Biden suggested supporters stick by Obama if the actions he takes are wrong or unpopular.

"Senator Obama won't have the right response, and we know that because we've seen the wrong response from him over and over during this campaign," he said.

Oh my, can we afford that inexperence?

Obama's VP Candidate admits Obama's lack of Experience is Dangerous!

Uncle Joe Biden put his foot in his mouth over the weekend and and I am sure Obama is pounding his head into the ground. So according to ABC news here is some selections from that master of oratorio.

"Mark my words, It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy.

Is he comparing Obama with a conservative Democrat like John Kennedy, Oh Please.

“The world is looking. We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy."

Why elect someone who can cause a crisis , then someone the world knows like John McCain. Obama is dangerous not just to the world, but to our country. Do we really need a inexperience President in office, Was it not Joe Biden who said: “The Presidency is not for on the job training”


"I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might originate," mentioning the Middle East and Russia as possibilities. "And he's gonna need help. “


I thought the Great Messiah Obama could handle this, He needs help?


“And the kind of help he's gonna need is, he's gonna need you - not financially to help him - we're gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it's not gonna be apparent initially, it's not gonna be apparent that we're right."

Well dude, he going to become one of the most weaken Presidents in history. If he wins he needs to become so weak the the great savior of all woman- kind (Hillary Clinton and step in to save the country the world and the Messiah.


Not only will the next administration have to deal with foreign affairs issues, Biden warned, but also with the current economic crisis.


That right folks he will need to widen the economic crisis by socking it to the rich and middle class., Laiding off people by the millions!



"I've forgotten more about foreign policy than most of my colleagues know, so I'm not being falsely humble with you.

Hey dude, I hope you remember something about foriegn policy, unless you copy it from Secetary Rice or Henry Kissenger.



This guy (Obama) has it. But he's gonna need your help. Because I promise you, you all are gonna be sitting here a year from now going, 'Oh my God, why are they there in the polls? Why is the polling so down? Why is this thing so tough?' We're gonna have to make some incredibly tough decisions in the first two years. So I'm asking you now, I'm asking you now, be prepared to stick with us. Remember the faith you had at this point because you're going to have to reinforce us."

Oh really, so after the bombings begin and the terrorism increases in this country and the unemployment rate raises we suppose to be faithful? Oh my this guy will become one of the most disastrous presidents in history!



"All kidding aside, these guys have left us in a God-awful place. We have the ability to straighten it out. It's gonna take a little bit of time, so I ask you to stay with us. Stay with us."


Well One God awful place? I was thinking of that as what a President Obama would do to thi world and this country if elected! By the way JOey, God didn’t make this country awful, the democrats certainly help! Biden has told us why we shouldn't elect Obama as President!

Unchecked Liberalism

This election is one we need to pay attention too. In the past on this blog we have warn you that this unchek liberalism could make our time one angerous times of nearly any generation. Don't take my word for it.
The Wall Street Journal laid it all out. Liberals are bent on handing Barack Obama a filibuster-proof Senate majority to rubberstamp his radical agenda.

"Though we doubt most Americans realize it, this would be one of the most profound political and ideological shifts in U.S. history. Liberals would dominate the entire government in a way they haven't since 1965, or 1933. In other words, the election would mark the restoration of the activist government that fell out of public favor in the 1970s. If the U.S. really is entering a period of unchecked left-wing ascendancy, Americans at least ought to understand what they will be getting, especially with the media cheering it all on." (Wall Street Journal, October 17, 2008)

The liberal Senate leadership already has the bills drafted to force its radical agenda on American families:

• Crippling new taxes: Obama oplanned mean new taxes on the rich and corporations, who will simpley laid off people. cutting back on products and services

• Staggering new government spending! New taxes for Democrats mean new spending by the government. Problem is there wil be less revenue, not more. which would mean Obama have to tax omre to supposely make up for the so-called lost of revenue.

• Outrageous paybacks to labor bosses; Increa labor cost mean companies will cut back, and vicous cycle.

• Liberal censorship of talk radio. Censorship of Rush LImbaugh, Sean Hannity and others, alternative voices to the democrat dictatory rule would become hard to find.

Now, with only a few weeks to go, liberals can taste it -- they believe that they will seize control of the Senate and guarantee a liberal agenda straight out of the 1970s.
Can we afford this type of Liberal Government?

Worst Recession in 25 years, Brought to You by Your Local Democrat Party

Looking down of the capitalist system is a favorite wipping boy of most Democrats. Well receently the finacial times said:

Many experts expect unemployment will soar from its current level of 6.1 per cent and worry it could go above 8 per cent. The Fed now thinks that unemployment will rise above 7 per cent and is likely to peak at about 7.5 per cent – a level last seen in 1992.


Further the Times writes:

Many economists think the savings rate – which was 0.2 per cent this year before being temporarily lifted by a tax rebate – will rise to between 3 per cent and 4.5 per cent. The fall in the price of oil will accommodate part of this.
But if it happens over a few quarters – as seems increasingly likely, given the shock to wealth and extreme denial of credit – it would produce a deep, if not necessarily long-lasting, recession.
Rising unemployment threatens to deepen the housing slump, further depress mortgage debt and increase delinquencies on car loans, credit cards and other consumer loans.
Meanwhile economic weakness is likely to multiply corporate defaults, including private equity deals. This second wave of losses for banks might prolong the credit crisis.


What a wonderful world the Democrats started and lets see if they can make it worst of make it better. Wonder what the odds in Vegas will be?

This Very Perilous Period

A friend of mine pointed out rightly, that not only his job, many many others in the defense industry is in jeopardy if the American people give power to the Democrats in office and this very perilous period or time we live in. The history of this period of time sways any sort of understanding of American history we live in, and time we find ourselves could hing on our very survival of our independence of our country.

We find our leaders faint in their abilities to lead in a time when we needed strong leadership. Sadly, President Bush has advocated his responsibility to lead and in some ways, who couldn't blame him with the attacks on his character. With his character under assault by the mass media he has lost his will to fight.


We could in many ways learn something from the emeries of this country. A constant reminder is that we are facing the very same reality that exist in the modern Islamic world today. We see the governments of those countries making sure the poor stay poor, the weak stay weak. We are seeing this in the lack of education, by not teaching them the true meaning of freedom. Keeping them in the same state is to the very leaders interest and advancement..

Do we see any parallels with the current modern Democrat Party. The poor will remain poor, the middle class will become poor as well. The rich will create less jobs and the classes will become wider and wider apart. Just as the Democrat party become more align with modern Islam then the Constitution principles of our Founding Fathers. We see our Democrat Party leaders becoming drunk with power as they plan a pre election party, expecting to win and planning a post election take over of the Government.

They will rule in the same matter as Islamic dictators and woe is the average American if he talks back to the so called majority. We are on the verge of a all powerful, weak minded, delusional government who with the media will slap any American down as they did with Joe the Plumber.

Free expression is something they do not tolerate, Free will is something they hate! We are on the verge of one of the most dangerous times in history.


Obama is not the right man for the right time for the country, His appearance on the scene, Hawkins back to Neville Chamberlain and the pre WWII days of peace at any cost and the social and Military disasters that ravage Europe.


We are to looking for a true leader, one that can only be found though great disaster and a willingness to lead. Nations like people, need sometimes to suffer in order to come out stronger.

Obama’s willingness to sit with Dictators will back fire on him. He will learn the hard way that sitting with the likes of Ahmadinejad, or Chavez is a prelude to disaster, just as Chamberlain found out with Hitler. Our willingness to sit down with people like Pelosi, Reid and Obama will to become a disaster. These are not honest men and women!

History is not for the faint of heart.

A Liberal Supermajority: We're So Screwed!

Guest Editorialist

Editors Note: This editorial is a guest editorial of close friend who works in the defense Industry. But the sentiments is clear.. We are facing disaster with a possible election of liberal socialist: His words are the words many of us would like to say. Hard to believe we face a reality of high taxation and representation of extremes.


The way I see it is that the danger from a far left, radical socialist liberals like Obama, Pelosi and Reid is much greater than that from Republican conservative that often crosses the line a ways in to liberaldom like McCain.

I've always liked Democrat, liberal Joe Lieberman (to name a one). McCain and Lieberman are very similar. I wouldn't have a lot of heartburn with Liebernan.

Obama, on the other hand, is a nice and smart guy, but he's the most radically left person in the Senate - and Joe Biden is #3 according to their voting records.

Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, and Harry Reid, leader of the Senate, are fundamentalist radical leftists. They decry the "fundamentalist" Christians, but they are even further left than those Christians are right. These are not your normal moderate Democrat liberals like Lieberman, but rather true believers in the socialistic fringe of the Democrat/Liberal party.

Normal liberal vs conservative competition is healthy, but when we abandon common sense because we're afraid and mad in a time of crisis, that's when it becomes dangerous. History is replete with examples of free societies that made the same serious mistake we're about to make: turning our futures over to some form of "saviour", which is what Obama has become.

FDR and LBJ were both radical leftists (actually, technically, FDR was an American form of fascist who idolized the same kind of fascist socialism Hitler and Mussolini advocated before their evil agendas transformed German and Italy into the nightmares they became). They fundamentally transformed our government and society from that of freedom to that of ever more socialism. Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are today's fundamentalist radical leftists that will once again force socialist changes - IF we make the mistake of permitting them to not only retain, but increase their power.

Regardless of how much I (and you) don't like McCain, he's nowhere near the threat to the American way of life posed by these far left Democrats represent if they have total control of every branch of government. McCain represents the same level of threat that, say, Lieberman represents.

This election isn't just the normal Republican vs. Democrat we've had during the last 40 years. It's truly Capitalism vs. Socialism, a referendum on the fundamental nature of our society and the environment our grandchildren will inherit.

This is no ordinary election. It will have repercussions for 100+ years (we're still dealing with the same kind of massive socialistic changes FDR made 60-80 years ago, and those by LBJ made "just" 50 years ago).

Closer to home, the probability that I'll lose my job is much, MUCH greater under Obama than McCain. If we can't stabilize this economy, layoffs and high unemployment are inevitable. Raising taxes in such an economy practically guarantees such: that's what FDR did that caused the Great Depression to be worse than it need to be.

I can't afford to lose my job when unemployment is high. I can't get a job that doesn't exist. I can't afford to lose the house I've almost paid off because of the total abject failure of the Democrats' socialist agenda to have the taxpayers provide "affordable housing" to those whom they knew couldn't pay for it. my son can't afford to graduate from college when unemployment is high. I can't afford to lose the car I'm still paying for. my son can't afford to lose the car he's still paying for.

Why would we give even more power to those morons who caused this economic crisis?

The Democrats totally betrayed our trust and wreaked havoc on our economy.

Why the hell would we give them even more power to pursue even riskier schemes than "affordable housing"? Their intentions are good, but when they abandon sound economic principles they hurt us all - just like now.

Despite his many failings, McCain just isn't anywhere near the threat to the American way of life that the combined Obama/Pelosi/Reid ticket represents.

We can't afford to give these radicals total, ultimate power that rational, dissenting voices have no power to oppose.

We just can't afford Obama/Pelosi/Reid to hold power simultaneously.

Obama + Pelosi + Reid = Radical Socialism

Vote for change: we NEED oppositional government

We're screwed if we don't.

I'm So Screwed.

Guest Editorialist
Editors Note: This editorial is a guest editorial of close friend who works in the defense Industry. But the sentiments is clear.. We are facing disaster with a possible election of liberal socialist: His words are the words many of us would like to say. Hard to believe we face a reality of high taxation and representation of extremes.


Obama and a Democrat Congress will dramatically shift defense spending to fund huge entitlement/welfare programs, creating The New New Deal.

What's that going to mean: massive layoffs in the Defense Industry starting, probably, next year and increasing thereafter after their bone headed, failed FDR era "fixes" for the economic crisis they, themselves, created, which will actually make it worse - just like FDR did, raising taxes and many other things during a time of economic crisis, causing my parents and millions of Americans to suffer for many years during the Great Depression.

The Democrat Congress is ALREADY cutting defense spending. Obama promised to cut billions more out of SDI and FCS and the far left loons in Congress (e.g., Pelosi, Reid) will take it even further. Where will they send that money: to socialized programs to pay for healthcare and the unemployment THEY created.

The probability of losing my job and losing the house I've made damn sure I paid for every month for years and years and nearly own will vastly increase with Obama's socialistic presidency and the radical left lock on Congress Pelosi & Reid will hold. If I lose my house, I'm certainly not going to benefit from the bail out of those morons who overreached into a mortgage they couldn't afford -- after making dam sure I paid my mortgage every single month. I'll be bailing them out while losing my job and my house. If I'm lucky enough that it's not me, it'll be hundreds of my friends.

And we're about to actually reward those same corrupt Democrat politicians that created this damn economic mess in the first place by not only putting them back in control, but giving them enormously greater power by having an absolute lock on Congress and the White House in which the Republicans can't stop or even moderate anything.

All because of Democrat's political power lust and their abject refusal to regulate the worthless Wall Street securities that resulted from their "affordable housing" agenda... and because Americans aren't interested enough to actually understand what's going on.

Elections have consequences.

Making bad electoral decisions have bad personal consequences.

We're so screwed.

Hello FDR 2 and The Great Depression: The Sequel. Sure glad I'll be able to get "free" (i.e., subpar) healthcare, welfare and a $5000 "tax refund" in excess of all those taxes I won't be paying because 95% of Americans will get a tax cut.

I can't tell you how pissed off I am at these corrupt Democrat SOB's, who are somehow bizarrely benefiting from the economic crisis they, themselves, created while audaciously blaming their disgusting handiwork on Bush and the Republicans, no less!!!!! I am outraged, but powerless to stop what will surely result from history repeating itself.

What are we in for?

We, as Americans, are woefully ignorant of our own recent history.

Excerpt from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html?mod=rss_opinion_main
If the current polls hold, Barack Obama will win the White House on November 4 and Democrats will consolidate their Congressional majorities, probably with a filibuster-proof Senate or very close to it. Without the ability to filibuster, the Senate would become like the House, able to pass whatever the majority wants.
Though we doubt most Americans realize it, this would be one of the most profound political and ideological shifts in U.S. history. Liberals would dominate the entire government in a way they haven't since 1965, or 1933. In other words, the election would mark the restoration of the activist government that fell out of public favor in the 1970s. If the U.S. really is entering a period of unchecked left-wing ascendancy, Americans at least ought to understand what they will be getting, especially with the media cheering it all on.
....
In both 1933 and 1965, liberal majorities imposed vast expansions of government that have never been repealed, and the current financial panic may give today's left another pretext to return to those heydays of welfare-state liberalism. Americans voting for "change" should know they may get far more than they ever imagined.


I'll only have two things to say if there's a Democrat sweep.

1. Thanks, America, for putting these corrupt morons back in power and giving them more.
2. Shit

If we put these morons back in power, we're so screwed.

America will never be the same.

Shall we call ourselves, the American Socialist Republic?

We can't afford to let the far left Democrats control Congress, The White House and the Judiciary at the same time.

Redistribute of Wealth and Elections

What I saw last Tuesday at the debate was honest man vs a dishonest one. Say What you will about McCain, he is that honest man.

We are looking however, at the fall of our system of elections. We are seeing today is the very destruction of it and what our Founding Fathers help established. One man, one vote is not the norm anymore in this country. We see democratic operatives who will fully subvert the laws and the constitution to their advantage.

We are looking at a collapse of our system of fairness and equality when it come to our elections. Whether your a Democrat or Republican or independent, the very system we believe in is no more. The very system that those brilliant men established in the year 1782 is lost and mired in a sea of politics. We have people in that system threatening the American people that if they do not elect Obama that we will have riots in the streets They are preparing the American people for the begining of the corruption we see in third world countries.

We are also seeing the end of democracy as we know it, as the couner stone. We are seeing a man, Barak Obama lie to American people about his intention of redistribution of wealth in this country openly.

The coming Socialist in a world where we thought Socialism and Nazism is death. Then we discovered that these people are still alive trying their best to run our system into the ground. The are not even afraid of the term anymore. A close Liberal friend of mind recently said to me directly that he didn’t see anything wrong with soialism

As we all know or should know is that on average almost 90 percent of people in this country do not pay Federal taxes. Something we should all examine more clearly in years to come. As a whole the American people, when it comes to economics, are the ignorant. And the democrats take advantage of it!

Base just on that, Obama will continue to lie with Democrats help to the American people. When it came to Taxing the rich we have experimented with this before.

When Obama said that for eight years the economic practices by Bush did not work. Then McCain should have said that the same practices that he believed in were the ones Reagan believe in. That Reaganomics work, and produce what the Democrats call the glory days of the 1990’s under Bill Clinton.

But in reality what is occurring now is the disastrous folly of Jimmy Carter and in some case Bill Clinton. These Bank failings do take time to develop, decades in most cases. These fail polices are coming to the fore front of American economics.
With the failures of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac we see the direction the democrats would take us.

But overall the democrats see a great opportunity to socialize 30 percent of the our economy with a Canadian -British style medicine, along with many other industries.

They cannot possibly believe that taxing the rich and muti-national corporations is what is going to bring one dollar more into the Treasury. This is about power, the power to redistribute the wealth in this country. In doing so putting millions unemployed and laying the bed rock of another take over of industry.

Obama said it himself to Joe the plumber that he wanted to redistribute the wealth in the country. His running mate told the American people that it was un Patriotic to not let the government tax them. But that too should ring allot of bells off on the average American. This is socialism , that fail system that every American should know, or been Educated about!

That in itself should disqualify Obama or Biden for President and Vice President of the United States. Giving these two guys the reins to the most powerful office is like giving a baby the keys to the car. Is it amazing that in a short two hundred or so years the this republic stood and yet it doesn't take long for liberalism to tear it down!

Obama Attacks Fox News

Obana and some liberals are attack Fox News Today in the New York Times Magazine. Obama Himself complained that if there were no Fox News:

“I might be two or three points higher in the polls, If I were watching Fox News, I wouldn’t vote for me, right?” Because the way I’m portrayed 24/7 is as a freak. I am the latte-sipping, New York Times-reading, Volvo-driving, no-gun-owning, effete, politically correct, arrogant liberal. Who wants somebody like that?
“I guess the point I’m making,” he went on, “is that there is an entire industry now, an entire apparatus, designed to perpetuate this cultural schism, and it’s powerful.”
Obama also said, referring to newsmen at Fox News and MSNBC: “If voters are … polarized and if they’re seeing two different realities, a Sean Hannity reality and a Keith Olbermann reality, then we’re not going to be able to get done the work we need to get done.”

Mr. Obama we already have a entire industry trying to get you elected, Theya re called NBC, CBS, ABC, New York Times and nearly every Newspaper in the country.

Obama complained about Fox News is amazing since he has nearly every news outlet in the country buying for his election and he complains about Fox?

He sounds more like a loser than someone who winning!

Obama is Spreading Something?

SOCIALISM ON THE MARCH!

ACORN Registers MIckey Mouse

After talking with Disney officials I have discovered that ACORN did try to register Mickey mouse to vote. Mickey has been trying for years to register and no one would believe that he actually wanted to vote. This year however, ACORN accomplished it. Disney spokesman said the Mouse try many times to vote, but was denied.
Last night, on Fox News On the Record, a ACORN official try to defend his groups activities saying that they register thousands in Ohio and how wonderful a accomplishment it was. It is to my wonderment that this group still does register people to vote. I am sure that however if Mickey was register to vote he would be Republican!

Democrats to Dangerous for a Dangerous World!

In three weeks we are about to enter one of the most dangerous periods in American History. It all depends on what we do in the Voting booth?
I am hoping that our people will not go backwards to Liberal socialism and look forward to a progressive conservative agenda.
In either course, we can expect much unrest in our society either way.

Some liberal pudents are already predicting unrst if Obama loses and in effect threathing the American people. You better vote Obama or you will not hear the end of it. White Americans are not only being threathen as rascist if they vote McCain. Nothing can be so dangerous than pitting one group of Americans against another.

Poisoning the Well, as my Grandfather use to say, before a vote can be cast. Polls are deceptive and if one group thinks they have it locked up and lose, then the call for unfair and rigged elections will go out, despite the results of the election.

This is a result of the 2000 election where democrats disputed a election when it was clear what happen. Democrats skew the reults to their favor even when they did not have the votes and voter faud was their stock in trade.

We are headed for uncertain times both in economics and politically. I fear for the Republic!!!

ACORN is Not About A Tree!

If you don’t know what ACORN is then maybe a litttle history lession is needed. ACORN is a group of supposly community organizations that have banned together to inprove life for the poor. Yet we find that very organization becoming a arm for the Democrat Party. Which By the way received about half of it’s revenues from the American people. (Stop scatching your head it embarrassing!)
ACORN registers people to vote for the very organization that supplies money to it for suppose commuity base programs. It has it fingers in programs from Illegal Immigration to even encouraging voter fraud.

Last July, ACORN settled the largest case of voter fraud in the history of Washington State. Seven ACORN workers had submitted nearly 2,000 bogus voter registration forms. Three ACORN election hoaxers pleaded guilty in October. A King County prosecutor called ACORN's criminal sabotage "an act of vandalism upon the voter rolls."

The group's vandalism on electoral integrity is systemic. ACORN has been implicated in similar voter fraud schemes in Missouri, Ohio and at least 12 other states. The Wall Street Journal noted: "In Ohio in 2004, a worker for one affiliate was given crack cocaine in exchange for fraudulent registrations that included underage voters, dead voters and pillars of the community named Mary Poppins, Dick Tracy and Jive Turkey.

In Ohio, we have learned recently that their is over 60 thousand fraudulent registrations, one woman on Fox News reported to Shepard Smith that she had registar some 16 times with 16 different addresses. That ACORN workers were literary chasing her down the street to get her too register over and over again.

But ACORN itself, contumies on it merry way to commit fraud agains tthe American people and find a outlet to bring about change in the same matter the Nazi party did in the early 1930’s.

This type of behaivor is not even recongized by the Democrat party who noninee is a founder ACORN Lawyer. That right Obama seems to see nothing wrong with the groups activites since he is a former employee of the organization.
Along with such dubious people like Bill Ayers, obama seems to be slicker than Slick wily himself.

However the Democrat party sees this group vital to it’s win in November by trying to fund it more when the ecomomic rescue plan seem to have a large earmark in it, for ACORN.

We do as I predicted has the corrupted election in history azbout to sprint on the scene, making 200o look like a walk in the park.

Sometimes You Just have to Laugh! Part Five

Sometimes You Just have to Laugh! Part Four

Gunman Kills 15 Potential Voters In Crucial Swing State

A Dangerous World

There are some polls that indicate that Obama could win on Nov. 4. We see the Democrats using the excuse that they are the only ones that are fair and they scream when the Conservatives in this country point out what is the truth.

However there is a strong chance of a tight race at the end of this month, and McCain could put out a win even when Obama looks so good to win, and despite the fact that Obama’s real record needs to be expose.

Obama is a committed socialist, and one that thinks there is a government solution for every problem. The lost is that we may in the first time in history see such a man in office.

His profile seems that we are for the first time not to able to discuss any of his past affiliations, like a common dictator. His pension to lie about his lack of achievements and his his uncommon willingness to silence his detractors is kinda reminiscent of Bill Clinton and it seem we could and most likely will see the return of the fairness doctrine, now that Air American is close to failing totally.

His ties to unrepentant terrorist William Ayers will also draw new attention. The record clearly shows that Obama was lying when he called Ayers just a guy "who lives in my neighborhood." which Governor Palin pointed out

Ayers got a $50 million grant for the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Obama was put in charge of giving out the money and funded left-wing groups like ACORN for a program that's now billed as "school reform" but amounted to political indoctrination.

However we may look at this once, this man get into office the American people will have hell getting him out. A prospect that that should frighten all of us.
Obama’s is far more dangerous and gullible then Bush ever would have been and yet we will not see a movie similar to Oliver Stone's Fairy tale “W”.

As the mass left wing media is currently I will not be surprise to see Obama win in November with the polls so skew as they were in 2000 and 2004 in favor of the democrats.

However if McCain wins, the Mass Left wing New media could do this country a disservice by not telling the truth about the current polls and skewing them towards Obama.

It's not very not widely know is that these polls if equal would have McCain two to three points above Obama. As I have said before we may have a very dangerous country either when or, if Obama wins, or when and, if McCain wins. This country will be in turmoil no matter what!

I not predicting the end of the world but I remember at movie in 1984 Ghostbusters where one of the lines read:

"The dead rising from the grave! Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes-- Riots in the streets, dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria!" Other than the cats and Dogs thing it will be a interesting four years! Then again I maybe wrong!

Palin Won, But Not on the Main Issue!

As debates goes this Vice Presidential debate was uneventful. With some miss opportunities by the Governor pointing out what seems to be that Obama's economic polices would be more in line with the former Soviet Union, than a free Market system which we suppose to have in the United States.. Going on the attack has not occurred as far as this blogger is concerned.

There is many many times McCain should be attacking Obama as a big Government Tax and Spend, class warfare liberal politician. The idea that we can tax the rich and not have it Boomerang on us by the loss of jobs. The same ole tired liberal Marta that we can have one class tax feeding the other in a symbiotic relationship. That one class will start to feel it is not being treated fairly and rebel.

This is pure and simple law of economics that you cannot continue to tax one segment of society without it grossly effecting the other with the loss of jobs and loss of income. Biden biggest gaff recently was his insistence that the rich were not being patriotic for not paying higher taxes. How insulting, when the 10 percent of the rich already are tax 60 percent to pay for big government now. And then to say that the 95 percent of us would not pay taxes if making less than 200 thousand? This is one dangerous fellow to the middle class because he cannot in any imagination make it work. That 95 percent is going to be tax, like it or not.

It is interesting that in the debate Senator Biden paraphrase McCain in saying that he believed that the “the fundamentals of our economy are strong”. Biden hammer on the subject and yet Gov. Palin should have said that she agree with McCain that yes, the fundamentals of our economy are strong!

How would Obama change our current Market system, if they feel that something is wrong with it? Would they change it by regulating it out of existence? Say what you will. the free market system does not work well by regulation and to change it to a Socialist Marxist system as seems Obama wants to do is a over reaction. That Obama represents the dangers of socialism. How naive Obama is, not just in Foreign policy, but how dangerous he would be in the overall economy of the United States.

This miss opportunity may and should corrected it in the next debate, But I do not believe it will. Obama is one of the most dangerous politicians in the Democrat Party today! Nothing can be so simple than to say that the leading presidential Candidate is a socialist! That is a miss opportunity!