Liberal/Progressives Outrageous Immigration Provisions

Things ytou should know about! Keep going the way they are going now and we will have a new Conservative Preisdent in four years!

Obama's Dangerous Combination!

If we had a delusions concerning our beloved President wasn’t a socialist we could now say that on April 17 he removed all doubt. Photographs released by the Venezuelan government showed Chavez, a fierce foe of former President George W. Bush, smiling and clasping hands with Obama at the start of the summit of Latin American and Caribbean leaders in Trinidad. One could wonder if Obama has any idea what he was doing or for that matter a clue to it, since he really could not have said anything since he left his TelePrompter at home in the White House.

We are left to wonder how much does President Obama agree with his co patriot Chavez who is a committed Socialist so willing to get along with the Cuban dictator Castro.

With this type of Back slapping and kissing up to Chavez and his recent bowing to King of Saudi Arabia, one must wonder exactly what is going thought the President’s head when he does things like this. His subjugating himself to both the King and Chavez makes himself a laughing stock.


His foreign policy a mess by giving a Queen of England a Ipod and the prime Minister of Great Britain 20 DVD’s of American Movies which did not work on British Video players and makes on wonder if this social worker really know what foreign policy is or should be.



President Obama put himself and his administration into a situation to resembles a old time snake oil salesman or a traveling mistral show. I wonder if he can dance? Obama has turned back the dignity and honor of Presidency to a Jester and our foreign relations that will suffer as he makes a fool of himself in the eyes of dictators and despots. One wonders if this is Change we can afford or Change to something far worst.

With Presidents Bush and Reagan they had core values that progressive liberals hated with Obama he had no core values and worst of all he is naive and gullible. Obama's lack of foriegn policy experence is catching up with him or is he just clowning around, because he really doesn know what he really is doing?

Whatever it is, Obama seems to resemble a constant sourse of amusment to world Leaders! I wonder what other priceless gifts President Obama will give to future leaders. Perhaps we can all be entertained as we see Chavez walk all over Obama and set our country back a few hundred years!

The Growing Discontent!

With every day that passes, Americans are growing more and more restless with the direction this country is going. Consider the following:



The trendline is unmistakable, the more people hear about what this administration has planned, and what it means to the individual, the more dissatisfied we are becoming. Mounting cost that the occur by the people for liberal spending and what this nation stands for is the center focus. Recently Tea parties simular remincent of the Boston Tea party is going to occur across this nation. I encouarge every one of you to join them. We are endanger of losing our national identlity and our liberty and most of all our freedom. Nothing is more important than that freedom.

We seen groups, oh so willing to even pull the tax exempted status of a church becauase, how dare that church take a moral stand against a issue. We've seen a president of the United States fire a CEO of a company. We are seeing the conversion of this country into a fascist country, where mob rule becomes a nor in the Halls of Congress, and when the very same Consgressman and Senators cause the very problem in the first place. We see our President instead of facing the problem run off to do the Tonight show rather than show leadership and face the problem head on.
This is why this work is important and needs to be carry on. There is still a tremendous amount of work to be done in making sure that people understand the true costs that all of our government spending will incur. In Tucson where this Blog orginates please atend the Tea party there at:



El Presidio Park
115 North Church St

When: April 15, 2009, 9 am to 2 pm



If you live in other cities please go to the one near you. Make your voice known!
, Make a difference! THERE NOTHING MORE IMPORTANT THAN LIBERTY!!!

Not so Freedom Tower?

On September 11th 2001, Our country was attack and the World Trade Center was destroyed and after many years of disagreement they Started the process of rebuilding. Governor Pataki of New York name the new tower the Freedom tower in honor of the victims who lost their lives on that day.
The freedom tower will be located in the northwest corner of the 16-acre World Trade Center with a 1,776-foot spire representing the year of the nations founding in 1776. The work on the freedom Tower began in 2006 and most likely be completed in 2012.

Liberal Slate Magazine once called the Freedom Tower: “a clumsy visual echo of the Statue of Liberty” But in reality the real problem was the name?
According to Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Chairman Anthony Coscia says that it's a bottom-line thing; One World Trade is just easier to market.

Former New York Governor George Pataki has come out strongly against the change, saying that the "Freedom Tower" name was "symbolic of our commitment to rise above the 9/11 attacks," and added that the World Trade Center name should not be reused out of respect for the dead.

Ok, now that the news was told on this blog, The real reason has nothing to do with marketing and it has everything to do the liberal- progressive thought that we not only need to Move-on but forget about the what happen on that faithful day. September 11 so sticks out in American history that it drives the liberals in this country absolutely crazy.

They done everything in their power to forget, and do so quite often that renaming things that helps in what they consider their own recover. Before September 11th they were so deranged on how George Bush robbed them of their glory of having one of the most corrupted Vice Presidents next to Aaron Burr to become President. After all who else in the world, would think of selling carbon credits, much like the 14th cwtury Popes selling indulgences! Great Money making scheme, wouldn't you say?


While it seems that far left does not wants is not to offend their Muslin cousins in hopes they would not fore stall any future attacks on the structure.

The far left’s obsession to getting along with people and trying their best to forget 9-11 in obvious, and laughable, if it wasn’t so serious, in our relationships to other nations as a whole. President Obama renaming the War on Terror to "Overseas Contingency Operation or as some far left calling the Islamic terrorist “freedom freighters” which is many examples for selective memories.

But I was thinking why stop their why not change the name of other moments and buildings across this nation. I have some suggestions:

Statue of Liberty could be called that Green old lady statue.
Liberty bell could become The cracked old bell.
Mt. Rushmore could become the four old men in the mountain and lastly the Lincoln Memorial could become The man with those many whiskers.

The left has become so willing to accommodate fascist that they willing to give up this country's soul to the many extremes of the world. They are afraid of the word freedom and willing to give up theirs in order to forget about what history has said about pacifist in the past. Some say Freedom is not free, others are willing to give it up to slavery for the sake of peace! There are so many wiling to give up their freedom for the sake of peace.

Auto Repair Government Style

Is this what we have to look forward too?

Trickle Down or Up?

As always I write this column in response to a friend who try to convince me how wrong Reagan was when he develop the trickle down theory! Of course I always defend Reagan as one of the greater Presidents we have had , and I misspoke in my defense of him when it came to the so-call Trickle down. In my years at BYU and other academia I never heard the term trickle down in economics classes.

In fact, one could say that the trickle down theory was not what Reagan was advocating at all.

Where did it come from? Well some quote David Stockman, the President’s Budget director, But Stockman was not even among the first thousand people to make that claim that advocated a "trickle-down theory.

Liberals so love the term it they been using it as a catch phase for years saying that was what Reagan was advocating and in the same breath denouncing it! There is a tenacity to cling to use words similar to safeguard their vision of the world and of themselves.

What often confused to them is what many including myself would call supply-side economics, such as that advocated by Arthur Laffer.
Laffer, is a "supply-side" economist who became influential during the Reagan administration as a member of Reagan's Economic Policy Advisory Board (1981-1989).
In economics, the Laffer curve is used to illustrate the idea that increases in the rate of taxation do not necessarily increase tax revenue. . Increasing taxes beyond the peak of the curve point will decrease tax revenue.

So his theory is that tax cuts can generate more tax revenue for the government because it changes people's behavior, causing more economic activity to take place, leading to more taxable income, as well as a faster growing economy.

It really not hard to find examples of this in our own economic history , which predates Reagan, during the Kennedy administration.

Kennedy cut the tax rates, to provide incentives to change economic behavior and it increased economic growth and individual incomes to the point that, more tax revenue was coming into the Treasury than had been the case under the higher tax rates. That is exactly what happened.

But it seems so many liberals will forget that this gave more money to the Federal Government which it seems Congress like under Reagan decided to go on a spending spree.

In reality Liberals or the so-alled progressives do not see their use of spending as a problem, and none of this has anything to do with money trickling down from the rich to the poor.
The political notions are dependency of the poor not on not the people that supply the jobs which in most cases are the upper class, it is to make them depended on the political class for those jobs.

The left are not as much interested in supplying of jobs for the people as to hey are in controlling the lower class thought political power. Obama’s redistribution of the wealth in this country is example of this.

Those who need to reeducated themselves need to take economic classes and realized that for Tax, money comes out of the pockets of the poor in this country.

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of Basic Economics writes:

“If education provides anything, it should be an ability to think -- that is, to weigh one idea against an opposing idea, and to use evidence and logic to try to determine what is true and what is false. That is precisely what our schools and colleges are failing to teach today.”

The sad part of it is that the liberals Progressives now believe that they need to express a new theory known as the Trickle up. This one has it roots in socialism in that all things come from the labor class. That would surprise many in industry including people like Thomas Edison, and maybe Walt Disney, whose Dreams of inventions were develop and cultured by the likes of JP Morgan and Bank of America.

Small Business fail by the thousands not because the workers who made it happen, didn’t do the job. Many factors including competition which some progressives/liberals can comprehend. Nor is this unique. No one who begins a company would expect to break even -- much less make a profit -- during the first year or two.


As much as they believe the workers are the real power it takes people like Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Thomas Edison and even Walt Disney with the help of JP Morgan to bring the product to market. Without these men the workers are left without direction and without a cause. The one thing the Left never gets, is that the Rich which includes those leftist Movie stars never pay taxes, it is the common folks who see the price of products go up and realized they are the ones paiding the taxes for the wealthy and corporations.

The real tax relief would be to make all corporations Tax free. What a concept!

Liberals and Progressives, The Same Old thing!

Not long ago, I wrote about the so-called progressives ie liberals, at that time I had a long time debate with a friend of mine, who I will call Paul.

Paul has always been a good friend and I count him as close, But of late, I wonder if he has abandon his principals in order to accommodate his new found belief system.

Now Paul hasn’t really change, he still believes in all the same old so-called liberal Ideas from Abortion on Demand to High taxes. But what has change is definitions. Remember, Progressives/Liberals remake themselves so very often that sometimes the definitions get blurr.

For example, recently many in their community begun to realized the the term Global warming wasn’t convincing enough so a new definition was created for the same ole, same ole. “Climate change” became the words.

It all has to do with trying to convince people that they are different , New found religion, as it were. They run from the label much like Tom Hayden a well known radical liberal has has done. So why do these so-called liberals like to be called Progressives these days. Well I figure that they figure conservatives have termed “liberal” in such a negative connotations.
So Many in the leftists community felt that those evil conservatives have successfully denigrated the word "liberal" in the minds of many voters.

As such, the term "progressive" is a useful public-relations tool, replacing "liberal" in campaign literature and helping sway voters who would otherwise not vote for a leftist candidate. But they do it so many times in all sorts of social causes.
So I wonder what exactly is someone progressive towards? That’s why I always laugh about that label. At least when you say your liberal you have liberty entwined as a concept, even thou that not exactly what you believe in. Liberty in today’s progressive or liberal world has nothing to do with real liberty.

Everybody likes progress yes? Capitalists think progress is more profits. Materialists think that progress is more machinery, technology, and toys. These are measurements of progress that are not used by progressives.
When we are talking about the politics of human society, a progressive is a person who believes that the progress of humanity is to be measured by the betterment of the human condition for the largest proportion of people as possible and that politics should in all cases be used to better the human condition for all and to distribute the benefits of society equally so that individuals receive equal opportunities for education, work, and fulfillment and no class, group, business, or private organization is enriched at the detriment or exploitation of people. Everything I mention is in itself contrary to what the current crop of liberal or progressives now believe.

But if you really want to think about it the so-called liberals or progressives are not at all progressive. They in really regressive. They believe in a so called Progressive income Tax, but as any economist will tell you it is regressive in nature. It forestalls growth and creates more trouble that it its is worth.

Other so called progressive ideas from Abortion to the environment are not progressive at all.

You really have think about the term to see that it’s not real. Everything about Liberal progressives is regressive. from the environment to lets say war? Recently the re definitions has begun to arrive in are current White House with the War on Terror being define to "Overseas Contingency Operation". I wondering if that could not only define what we are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan, but also Hillary’s husband tour of Red light districts in Foreign countries?

What has happen is that the pre 9-11 mentally has become apparent and in some cases the Blame the US for everything has rear it’s ugly head again. Some liberal/Progressives would say that the War on Teror was a darn inconvince and so what if 300 people died.

The new definitions are nothing new when it comes to the Liberals or progressives, It just how far back these folks want to reach back, which defines them as regressive after all.

The real progressives are conservatives and they though would gag people like Paul. Progressive conservatives want a flat tax, want it to be fair and equal. They feel that everyone should paid their fair share. So called liberal Progressives want to tax one group at the a higher rate. Not realizing that the very same group that they tax employes the other group. The real progressive help pass the Civil rights acts in the 1960's and the end of slavery previous to that.

Going from Taxes to abortion and realizing that every human has rights it seems that liberal progressives would rather kill off their tax base, by killing off the next generation of taxpayers, A progressive concept that still confuses me?

So what are we left with is new definitions from the so-called old school progressives. When you look at a 3.6 trillion dollar budget a nearly trillion dollar stimulus bill and the trillions the Democrats has offer up to the American People, we can only say: This isn’t change it’s Regressive polices of the left with nothing Progressive about it.

Redefinitions do make you anymore different that what you were previously. Can you spell LIBERAL?