Most Frightening Thing!

I Though Jason was bad, and then I thought Willard was bad, but now the most frightening thing coming around is, YES, we all know, the election this Tuesday.. I have come to conclusion that I am going to find a nice movie, and some popcorn and ignore the election day. My advice to everyone is to curl up with a book, a movie or go camping.
This maybe be your last chance if you know what best for you.And if all else fails I have have some advice for you concerning some activities for you.

Miniature Golf: Nothing more exciting than to kick around a ball the size of some democrat’s head.

Bowling: Nothing like rolling a ball the size of some democrat’s ego.




Well you could go to a movie, the new High School Musical 3 is well worth the 7 to 8 dollars to see, rather than Obama. I give HSM3 a 5 stars rating. The Obama inforcommerial I give mimus 6 for the most boring thing on television next to "My Mother the Car" Reruns!

The best thing I can tell you is to turn off the television, go on a week day trip lasting through Wednesday and pray that the Obama the class A socialist is not elected. Because in Ali likely hood this is the last vacation most of us are going to see for the next four years! God help us all!

Obama Vs McCain a 2008 version of 1948 Dewey vs Truman

Today column is one of either hopeful optimist or resign to defeat. So you would have to take your pick! A no time in History have we seen the press and pollsters so work together to make a candidate win a election as we see in the 2008. Not since the Dewey-Truman run have we see Fluxuating polls and the Press and some blogs out to get a vice Prudential candidate as we have now.
As a historian, I study history trying to come up with trends in history. The Truman Dewey contest in 1948 was one we all can and should remember if you study your history right. Thomas Dewey the darling of the Republicans and the sitting President of the United were fighting tooth and nail for the office.
The pollsters and Press at this time had Dewey willing the election and the famous headline in the Chicago tribune read
“The Dewey Defeats Truman”. The Tribune was not the only paper to make the mistake. The Daily Journal of Commerce had eight articles in its Nov. 3 edition about what could be expected of President Dewey.

The paper's five column headline read, "Dewey Victory Seen as Mandate to Open New Era of Government-Business Harmony, Public Confidence.


"The polls, reporters, political writers - they all believed Dewey was going to win by a landslide. On September 9, 1948, Elmo Roper was so confident of a Dewey win that he announced there would be no further Roper Polls on this election. Roper said, "My whole inclination is to predict the election of Thomas E. Dewey by a heavy margin and devote my time and efforts to other things."However Truman was undaunted and believed that with a chance he would win the election.
In one poll of political journalists by Newsweek October 1, 1948 issue, Newsweek they asked “which candidate they thought would win. Appearing in the stated the results: all 50 believed Dewey would win.”

Rhodes Cook is a veteran Washington political analyst for the Wall Street Journal writes:
"There is the sense that the Illinois senator may be putting the cart before the horse, a Dewey-like affliction of presumptive victory. And there are few things more off-putting to voters than having their ballots taken for granted. To be sure, Mr. Obama has to transform himself virtually overnight from being largely unknown to a candidate widely recognized to have the credentials to be president – a difficult feat for anyone to execute.
And there are admittedly clear differences between the 2008 campaign and the Dewey-Truman contest of 1948. Mr. Dewey was already a known commodity back then, having lost the 1944 election to Franklin Roosevelt. The Republican’s dapper presence and cool public demeanor made him no favorite of the press......
Yet there are also some critical similarities between the two elections. Just as the Democrats now, the Republicans in 1948 were bullish about their chances of capturing the White House after winning control of both houses of Congress two years earlier. As in the present, the campaign of 1948 was widely viewed as a “change” election, with a significant gap in ages between the two major-party nominees. Mr. Dewey, at 46 years old (the same age as Sen. Obama, who turns 47 on Monday), represented a new generation of leaders ready to move to the fore after World War II. Mr. Truman was nearly 20 years his senior, old enough to have served with distinction in World War I as a field artillery captain"

John McCain could be the Republicans Truman? Yet we going to see changes no matter what. certainly the big lie that Obama is that "Change" is something we will have to face. He is the rock star, a Messiah, Either way we will be left holding the bag at the end of the election. This is the first time in my memory we will see a candidate win a election by proposing tax hikes as McGovern did. I will discuss what happens after this election. next week. But a hint to that article is that even if Obama wins this election, the Liberal socialist Democrats lose.
I realized I jumping from either Obama wins or McCain wins, however, I feel we are looking at a disaster either way.
2012 is coming and I do not believe Obama is going to be President. I could be wrong and I often am. I still believe that a defeat of Obama could mean a win by Hillary in 2012. I still believe McCain will win, by a slime 2000 and 2004 margin.

Could history repeating itself? We never know. Real Change is coming!

Obama and Socialism

A many weeks ago a Friend we will call Mike said, and asked me if I knew what real socialism was all about, Ie concerning my remarks that Obama was a died hard socialist. But I took from that, that maybe, just maybe he really didn’t know what one was himself. Liberal Academics are fun these days in the twisting of facts and the multilation of realities. So lets have some fun in comparing the current Obama Campaign to what we know about Socialism.

If we are to understand what Obama and the “Socialist” Democrat party want, we have to refer to the dictionary to get a definition. That is, if the socialist havn’t redefine for us: “Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state or collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and the creation of an egalitarian society.”

We can then say that some of the very changes that Obama uses as a campaign slogan are socialistic? Karl Marx wrote; “From Each According To His Ability - To Each According To His Need” seems to becoming the modern version of what has turned into a new Obama motto of : “Change” or for that matter what is consider “Fair” to the American people. Obama said that he just wanted to spread the wealth around. The exact meaning certainly seems to be obvious and that was to take from one group and give it to another. Joe the Plumber correctly phase this as Socialism, the very system that fail.

The question is: “Why should so many rich people have so much more money than soo many poor?” That certainly isn’t “Fair” is it? I mean really! His VP Candidate Joe Biden said that it was unpatriotic not rich to pay taxes. I sure that Thomas Jefferson would agree, Duh NO!
Are any number of social issues that hamper success in this country, pushing back one group over another? Modern socialism originated in the late nineteenth-century working class political movement. This obsolete system express by Karl Marx posited that socialism would be achieved via class struggle and a proletarian revolution which represents the transitional stage between capitalism and communism.

Obama seems to share the belief with modern day socialist that capitalism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital and creates an unequal society. In other words this is Obama’s very campaign slogan which he uses the word “Change” as a stepping stone to the very same Socialism. Obama advocates it seems, the creation of an egalitarian society, in which wealth and power are distributed more evenly though taxation In Obama’s platform. Another dividing feature of the socialist movement is the split on how a socialist economy should be established between the reformists and the revolutionaries. We have not heard from the democrats or Obama yet, but the very Nationalization of some of the Banks could be a step in that direction. Some socialists advocate complete nationalization of the very means of production, distribution, and exchange; while others advocate state control of capital within the framework of a market economy.


The current Market economy literally stands in the way of so-call progressive trends that Obama and other Progreives like to establish in the country. They feel that we didn’t give socialism a chance to survived? Why should we since the Socialist system has to be built on a market economy, before it wipes it out. I once asked a couple of my students if they believe that Obama was spreading Socialism and their answer was that in a way they believe he was, They saw nothing wrong with government control of a few of our industries?


Sadly, it is still express by the some who believe that "change" is something our system truly needs. But is socialism the change we ned? Obama’s fascination with this concept means we are about to experience it for ourselves if elected. My Students claim that past tries at socialism like the Soviet Union and Communist China wasn’t really socialism and more a dictatorship. They feel that Lenin Stalin and Mao perverted it and that real socialism wouldn’t have killed 60 million people as Stalin did.

Liberals and radicals claimed that this was not true socialism. Yet the Weather Underground, chief belief was that in order to established their form of socialism that they need to eliminate at least 28 million Americans who would be a distraction to achieving their goal of a socialist United States. Eliminate is such a nice word to the real word is to murder? Because in the long run it would take a Final solution to really kill the market system. This would have to be a Long, Long road to Change. But the people would have to be condition for that "Change"? Would they not? Is this conditioning occurring now with Obama?

Can it be? That one of the founding Fathers of this group hung around Barak Obama and Obama started out his campaign in his home? Obama let slip his socialist leanings to Joe the plumber when he denied he wanted to punish wealth and insisted he just wanted to spread the wealth around.

Yet Many Americans along with Joe just could not understand Obama’s cavalier attitude toward the American dream.
Democratic commentator Bob Beckel was dismissive of the significance of Obama's outright nod to socialism, saying we've had a progressive tax system since the income tax was initiated.

But what Beckel did not explain is that at least in those days, the stated purpose of the income tax system was to fund government services, not to redistribute wealth.
Is it to hard for people in this country to understand that the Obama and Democrats are not being Progressive, but regressive. To even look to a fail system of government, can’t be label progressive in any real stretch of the imagination. Yes I said the word Socialism. We in this country are about to discover what it really means. Yes Mike, I think I know what it means, and like Joe the Plumber it frightens the hell out of me. God help us!

Is Obama repeating Presidents Hoover's and FDR's mistakes?

From the Anonymous Contributor


Are we about to repeat the tragic mistakes Presidents Hoover and FDR made that created the Great Depression?

Hoover was president when the Depression started in 1929. FDR was elected president in 1932 because Hoover's actions made the Depression worse. FDR's subsequent actions also made it worse by prolonging the depression, eventually resulting in a "recession within a depression" from 1937-8, almost 10 years after the initial crash. The beginning of the end started in when the US entered WW II (1941). The economics of the war was the only thing that ended The Great Depression. None of Hoover's or FDR's remedies ended it, but instead made the Depression longer and harder, turning a normal short term repression into a terrible 12+ year depression.

Is history repeating itself right before our eyes?

It appears so.

Obama modeled his economic platform after Hoover's and FDR's most disastrous policies.

Hoover implemented the catastrophic Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act which worsened the depression by seriously reducing international trade and causing retaliatory tariffs in other countries. US exports fell causing prices to fall and Americans to loose income. Hardest hit were farm commodities such as wheat, cotton, tobacco, and lumber, causing many American farmers to default on their loans, leading to the bank runs on small rural banks that characterized the early years of the Great Depression

Failing to learn from Hoover's disastrous mistakes, Obama and the Democrat Congress promise to pursue the same protectionist impulse by "renegotiating" the NAFTA trade agreement to "protect" American workers. This means that free trade will not be so free anymore, which will, again, cause other countries (e.g, Canada and Mexico) to retaliate to "protect" their citizens.

Have we learned nothing?

FDR was an excellent speaker that projected a calm persona, a "progressive" wealthy man who assailed the wealthy. He and the Democrats of the era were fascinated with the great socialist, communist and fascist experiments countries like Russia, Germany and France were undertaking. These were new and exciting ideas on how to solve real problems: even some conservatives were intrigued. As the president over a downtrodden and hurting people, FDR was excited to actually have the opportunity to try his hand at such socialistic grand experiments in American, believing it a moral and patriotic experiment to solve our country's ills.

FDR primarily blamed the excesses of big business for causing an unstable bubble-like economy. Democrats believed the problem was that business had too much money, and the New Deal was intended as a remedy, by empowering labor unions and farmers and by raising taxes. FDR lambasted "trickle down" economics, extolled "trickle up" economics and pit the middle class against "the rich", raised their taxes in order to provide a "more equitable opportunity to share in the distribution of national wealth... [in] The New Deal...." FDR comprehensively restructured the economy and Wall Street. FDR left us with huge new social programs that are still on the books, the cost and size of which have spiraled out of control ever since.

Today, Obama, exactly mirrors everything above.

He believes socialism works and wants to conduct even more experiments to see if he can solve our ills with "progressive" programs like national healthcare. He's an excellent speaker projecting a calm persona, that blames his own class, "the rich" and "big business" for the economic crisis, promises to raise taxes to "spread the wealth around", wants to strengthen labor unions, wants significant regulatory power to comprehensively restructure the economy and Wall Street, create some form of the WPA style work programs, lambasts "failed trickle down" economics, extolls "growing the economy from bottom up" and callously plays "middle" vs "rich" class warfare. He wants to permanently add significant new social programs to our government, the cost and size of which will once again balloon far beyond his already overly expensive initial proposals. Just as FDR, he and his running mate believes it to be morally "patriotic" to be forced to pay higher taxes on behalf of the greater good.

Have we learned nothing?

Americans were hurting and afraid during the Great Depression. They put their trust in saviors who only hurt them more. Theirs turned out to be a false hope. Hoover's and FDR's policies turned a recession into a 12+ year depression that was only fixed by a wartime economy. Their kind of socialism doesn't work.

Will Obama's recycling of failed Hoover & FDR policies lead us straight into another bleak era in our history? Obama appears to be pursing that same policies and same kind of radical socialism they mistakenly believed in. He modeled his campaign and economic platform after FDR's disastrous policies and includes some of the most disastrous Hoover policies. Is Obama the answer or just another FDR socialist that will give us programs that won't help and that we can't afford?

Making matters worse is the fact the far left triaxial government of President Obama, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid would possess an absolute lock on Congress and the White House, with absolutely nobody able to oppose their far, far left agendas. Pelosi and Reid are far more reckless and ideological than Obama. Together they will have free, unopposed, reign and absolute power to enact any and all normal and socialist agendas they desire.

Are we again allowing our emotions and need to be rescued from our troubles to overpower our intellect and good judgement?

Have we learned nothing?

This is most definitely NOT your run-of-the-mill Democrat v. Republican election.

This is a significantly transformative turning point in our future that we dare not take lightly.

We must be sure that we know exactly what we're doing and where we're going. If we fail, we will suffer the immediate consequences, starting next year. Our grandchildren will labor under much larger tax burdens to fund the Next Great Ociety we build for ourselves.

If we absolutely must vote for Obama, we should at least provide a counter balance in Congress and demand that he refute his plans to again employ the programs and policies that led to so much misery during the Great Depression.

Do we once again permanently increase that failed dependency of socialism in our country or do we revitalize that same spirit of American Exceptionalism that our country was founded on and made it great?

Have we learned nothing?

Glenn Beck on Fox News: Coming this Spring!

Blow me away, for the last two years I been watching the Glenn Beck TV program on CNN Headline News, Something by the way that puzzles me when today I turned on to se him and dog gone it Lou Dobbs was on. Lou is not Glenn in any stretch of the Imagination. But Glenn Beck is a original and great broadcaster.
His commentaries have upset Hispanic groups, Arab-American organizations and the liberal Media Matters for America which please me no end, He will going to Fox New and will host a 5 p.m. weekday program as well as a weekend show in a multi-year deal that starts next spring.

“I’m not surprised to see him go because it always seems like he fit in well with the other Fox people instead of with Headline News,” said Alan Breznick, an analyst with Heavy Reading, a media and telecommunications research firm based in New York. “I think (CNN) wanted character, but they didn’t necessarily want conservative ideologies.”


So good news for us conservatives Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly and then Sean Hannity, Oh I have to mention Alan Colmes! Nope don't have too! Only wish he would be on sooner for Elections!

Generated Crisis!

Joe Biden warned that America's enemies would test Barack Obama with an international crisis within six months if he's elected president - a shocking comment John McCain eagerly pounced on yesterday to claim Obama isn't ready to be commander-in-chief.

A: “generated crisis”! In other words a generated Terrorist attack on this country. One we have not experience since 9-11- 2001. Of course the generated Crisis that happen to Bush was supposedly by radical democrats generated by us? What a bunch of nuts.

So I asked you what else did Plagiarism Joe Have to say, That NBC New will not release? Being that NBC News is in the tank for oh Obama?

Since Plagiarism Joe believes that we will have a attack if Obama is elected, then why in heaven’s name do so? This is one of the most political big mistakes that Biden has made.

John McCain said of Biden's remarks: "The next president won't have time to get used to the office. We face many challenges here at home and many enemies abroad in this dangerous world," McCain said. "We don't want a president who invites 'testing' from the world at a time when our economy is in crisis and Americans are already fighting two wars."

McCain said it was even "more troubling" that Biden suggested supporters stick by Obama if the actions he takes are wrong or unpopular.

"Senator Obama won't have the right response, and we know that because we've seen the wrong response from him over and over during this campaign," he said.

Oh my, can we afford that inexperence?

Obama's VP Candidate admits Obama's lack of Experience is Dangerous!

Uncle Joe Biden put his foot in his mouth over the weekend and and I am sure Obama is pounding his head into the ground. So according to ABC news here is some selections from that master of oratorio.

"Mark my words, It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy.

Is he comparing Obama with a conservative Democrat like John Kennedy, Oh Please.

“The world is looking. We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy."

Why elect someone who can cause a crisis , then someone the world knows like John McCain. Obama is dangerous not just to the world, but to our country. Do we really need a inexperience President in office, Was it not Joe Biden who said: “The Presidency is not for on the job training”


"I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might originate," mentioning the Middle East and Russia as possibilities. "And he's gonna need help. “


I thought the Great Messiah Obama could handle this, He needs help?


“And the kind of help he's gonna need is, he's gonna need you - not financially to help him - we're gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it's not gonna be apparent initially, it's not gonna be apparent that we're right."

Well dude, he going to become one of the most weaken Presidents in history. If he wins he needs to become so weak the the great savior of all woman- kind (Hillary Clinton and step in to save the country the world and the Messiah.


Not only will the next administration have to deal with foreign affairs issues, Biden warned, but also with the current economic crisis.


That right folks he will need to widen the economic crisis by socking it to the rich and middle class., Laiding off people by the millions!



"I've forgotten more about foreign policy than most of my colleagues know, so I'm not being falsely humble with you.

Hey dude, I hope you remember something about foriegn policy, unless you copy it from Secetary Rice or Henry Kissenger.



This guy (Obama) has it. But he's gonna need your help. Because I promise you, you all are gonna be sitting here a year from now going, 'Oh my God, why are they there in the polls? Why is the polling so down? Why is this thing so tough?' We're gonna have to make some incredibly tough decisions in the first two years. So I'm asking you now, I'm asking you now, be prepared to stick with us. Remember the faith you had at this point because you're going to have to reinforce us."

Oh really, so after the bombings begin and the terrorism increases in this country and the unemployment rate raises we suppose to be faithful? Oh my this guy will become one of the most disastrous presidents in history!



"All kidding aside, these guys have left us in a God-awful place. We have the ability to straighten it out. It's gonna take a little bit of time, so I ask you to stay with us. Stay with us."


Well One God awful place? I was thinking of that as what a President Obama would do to thi world and this country if elected! By the way JOey, God didn’t make this country awful, the democrats certainly help! Biden has told us why we shouldn't elect Obama as President!