The Daily Show's response to Countdown's Keith

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy<

Move-on.org Anti Freedom of Speech!

This weeks ruling that Corporations had freedom of speech has made George Soro’s Move-on. org. very un happy and the reason are quite clear! They do not want the competition.
The ruling would in effect give Move on and other like minded organizations real competition that it never had.

In a release by move-on we read the following:

Their 5-4 decision gives corporations free rein to spend unlimited amounts of money on elections.”

and then they cry:

“It's a horrible decision. But we can undo some of the damage if Congress passes public financing of elections, which would give progressives and populists who don't have industry backing the ability to compete. There is already a public financing bill, the Fair Elections Now Act, with significant, bipartisan support.2 Congress, which right now desperately needs to show that it's on the side of the voters instead of corporate interests, should rush to pass it.”

That's right folks they want to spend our money to have what they can Public financing of elections. Come on folks let me have your money so we can spread it around to candidates that are in a word un-american! Surely, you like that, wouldn't you?

George Soro wouldn’t want to keep spending his own money on the disastrous accomplishments of organizations like Move-0n.org. Certainly with the bankruptcy of Air “Head” America the limits of their message is really not taking off with the American people.

Scott Brown’s election last week proved that the liberal democrats are not getting the message that the American people want them to hear.

Allot corporations made up of people in this country to speak their minds is freedom of speech and Mr. Soro’s will have to dig alittle deeper to get their liberal progressive socialist message out.

but we all know Moveon.org doesn't want to compete with other people's ideas. They are afraid of them, much like Hitler was when he oppose other political parties including the Communist. This is of course a country of Ideas, but to moveon, it is only their Ideas that have any merit.

This is time for Conservatives to now bring the truth out to the American people, the freedom that our Founding Fathers would encourage us to do, and that we all speak our minds, right or wrong. Something that Moveon.org cannot stand! Freedom of Speech!

Air “Head” America ENDs Broadcasting

In a Press release today Air America decided to, well let them say it:

“It is with the greatest regret, on behalf of our Board, that we must announce that Air America Media is ceasing its live programming operations as of this afternoon”

Oh my Put those poor people out to work, it goes on:

“and that the Company will file soon under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code to carry out an orderly winding-down of the business.”

OH MY RUSH, GLENN AND HANNITY must be crying!
The very difficult economic environment has had a significant impact on Air America's business.”
Could it be that Air America’s Radical belief could not compete with Conservative talk, which seems to be doing fine in the difficult economic environment!

“This past year has seen a "perfect storm" in the media industry generally. National and local advertising revenues have fallen drastically, causing many media companies nationwide to fold or seek bankruptcy protection. From large to small, recent bankruptcies like Citadel Broadcasting and closures like that of the industry's long-time trade publication Radio and Records have signaled that these are very difficult and rapidly changing times.”

Yes but you have to have Broadcasters who do fill their time slots with Hate speech!

“Those companies that remain are facing audience fragmentation as a result of new media technologies, are often saddled with crushing debt, and have generally found it difficult to obtain operating or investment capital from traditional sources of funding. In this climate, our painstaking search for new investors has come close several times right up into this week, but ultimately fell short of success.”

Nobody want to advertise in a eviroment of hate!

“With radio industry ad revenues down for 10 consecutive quarters, and reportedly off 21% in 2009, signs of improvement have consisted of hoping things will be less bad. And though Internet/new media revenues are projected to grow, our expanding online efforts face the same monetization and profitability challenges in the short term confronting the Web operations of most media companies”

Conservative talk radio doesn’t seen to have a problem, and seems to generate new ad money for the company. Liberal/ Progressive hate doesn’t bring about cash revenue.

“When Air America Radio launched in April, 2004 with already-known personalities like Al Franken and then-unknown future stars like Rachel Maddow, it was the only full-time progressive voice in the mainstream broadcast media world.”

We of course are all crying!”

“At a critical time in our nation's history — when dissent on issues such as the Iraq war were often denounced as "un-American" — Air America and its talented team helped millions of Americans remember the importance of compelling discussion about the most pivotal events and decisions of our generation.”

It was Un american Speech in a time of war! It was proven wrong 100 percent of time!

“Through some 100 radio outlets nationwide, Air America helped build a new sense of purpose and determination among American progressives. With this revival, the progressive movement made major gains in the 2006 mid-term elections and, more recently, in the election of President Barack Obama and a strongly Democratic Congress.”

Yes and if Obama was doing so well then why didn’t Air America do well as well. Air American brought about their own destruction with reassurgence of Conservatives such as MacDonald of Virgina, Chrisiti of New Jersey and Brown of Massachsetts.

“Laws have changed for the better thanks to this revival.....but all the same our company cannot escape the laws of economics. So we intend a rapid, orderly closure over the next few days. All current employees will be paid through today, January 21. A severance package will be offered tomorrow to full-time current employees with more than six months of tenure.”

With Just a hundred radio stations the nice people that work for them will be able to go have successful careers in the Supermarket industry.

“We will strive to assist affiliates and partners in achieving a smooth transition. Starting at 6 pm EST today, we will provide our affiliates, listeners and users a selection of encore programming until 9 pm EST on Monday, January 25, at which time Air America programming will end.”

Yeas Right!!

“We are proud that Air America's mission lives on through the words and actions of so many former radio hosts who are active today in progressive causes and media nationwide. In the years ahead, as we look back, we should all be proud of our passionate determination to assure that our nation's progressive voice would be heard loud and clear. Through the hard work and dedication of current staff, and those who preceded you, a lasting legacy was forged which will now continue through other voices and venues.”

Well with MSNBC ratings buttoning out, there will be a time that even then NBC will be have to change. How long will it take? Who knows!

Don't Trust Them!!!

Associated Press Writer ALAN FRAM, Writes today that:

“Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Thrusday that she lacks the votes to quickly move the Senate's sweeping health overhaul bill through the House, a potentially devastating blow to President Barack Obama's signature issue.
Pelosi, D-Calif., made the comment to reporters after House Democrats held a closed-door meeting at which participants vented frustration with the Senate's massive version of the legislation.
Her concession meant there was little hope for a White House-backed plan to quickly push the Senate-approved health bill through the House, followed by a separate measure making changes sought by House members, such as easing the Senate's tax on higher-cost health plans. Such an approach would be "problematic," she said.

"In its present form without any changes I don't think it's possible to pass the Senate bill in the House," Pelosi said, adding, "I don't see the votes for it at this time."
Pelosi's remarks signaled that advancing health legislation through Congress will likely be a lengthy process — despite Democrats' desire for a quick election-year pivot to address jobs and the economy, which polls show are the public's top concern. "We're not in a big rush," Pelosi said. "Pause, reflect."

Please don’t think this is the time to celebrate and be careful these progressives are not to be trusted.

Go Scott Go!!!

Watch CBS News Videos Online

NOT KENNEDY'S SEAT, IT'S THE PEOPLE'S SEAT - BROWN

MASSACHUSETTS MIRACLE

LET'S PRAYER FOR A MIRACLE!

Ed Would Cheat!

Is the Democrats Super-Majority about to End?

This week we see signs that the liberal Progressive are worry about there super majority, Whether the Democrats want to admit it or not. You see far left organizations such as Move-on.org appearing to members for money to stop the Republicans from taking the Late Senator Ted Kennedy’s seat. In a email expressing the following you read:

“And Republican Scott Brown? He's a "free enterprise advocate" who thinks the system works just fine. But he's giving Coakley a serious challenge. He promised, "As the 41st (Republican) senator I can stop a lot of this stuff in its tracks...”

Since when is being a believer in a free market system, a strike against a Person? Well certainly if you belong to a organization such as Move-on.org. Does anyone now believe that this organization isn’t socialist movement? I know that is a dirty word these days, but when you see what Move-on supports you got to come to a conclusion that it is Marxist.

They the Progressives are extremely worry that with state Sen. Scott Brown against a very weak Democrat Martha Coakley that this would show that they cannot hold back the avalanche of unsatisfied voters who see a danger in the liberal/progressive moment.

They are very afraid that will lose not just this seat, but others as well. Look at Senator Harry Reid’s seat in Nevada and the 10 points behind any leading Republican.

There is a chance they will lose not only health care. recent report have Brown neck and neck, and the reports are that he is 4 points ahead of Coakley and with Tuesdays’ election coming fast we are about to maybe see a turn around in the make up of not only health care, but every other Progressive agenda. Imagine Ted Kennedy's seat held by a Republican? But as Scott Brown said during the Debate, that this wasn't Ted Kennedy's seat, But the People's seat!

They are so afraid that they will lose this election and that they will telegram to Brown that his confirmation into the senate would come after Obama health care bill was pass. This desperation move either show signs that they know that losing the election or threatening he Brown that they do not care what the people of Massachusetts say after the Jan 19 election. But in a way they threaten the People of the Commonwealth that are voting wrong! Democratic Pollster Doug Schoen said on Fox News "Hannity Program" that everything is going for Brown to win and that the Democratic Party will lose more in the future.

One of the many reasons the House and senate may rush the so-called Health care reform through in order to get it thought before Brown is swore in.

But this shouldn’t surprise anyone, in as much as the Democrats are frighten this coming November election. Their super majority was gone when Republicans won in November with Virgina and New Jersey decided that Republicans were better able to run those state. Lets all hope that the Democrats do not cheat as have done in Minnesota.. But I wouldn’t put it pass them!

It you wan to donate to the Scott Brown for Senate, go here!

Mr Ed vs Mr Ed?

Almost fifty years ago executives at CBS decided that Sundays night needed some Interlectional programing, so they came up with a new concept and that was a "talking horse" by the name of Mr. Ed and it was a moderate hit. It certainly took the edge off the end of the weekend!

Last year, MSNBC started a spin off of Mr. Ed series and found a guy by the name of Ed Schultz. Ed is a rolly polly looking guy, reminds me of Michael Moore. They change the concept of the series, instead of finding a horse to host the program, they found a human being able to play the horse, or in other words be a horses ass!

Mr. Ed (Schultz) came from the Fargo, North Dakota area where he was know to be a hind end of a horse. He was known to be sportscaster for many of the teams in the State, and at one point started a riot at a local football game . Ed is in every way a opportunists and makes out to be a progressive liberal. But if he could make money being a conservative, he would and a carbon copy of Rush Limbaugh. Locate Towns People called him the town idiot and he tried to be conservative.

Callers used to call him and give him particular hell till one day he simply switched horses and started to preach liberalism.

Well it never really caught on, he was sort of comedy relief for People who listened to Rush. One Fargo resident said about Mr Ed:

“we got a kick out of the Ed as he tried to be the liberal Rush Limbaugh......I still chuckle when I hear the idiot.... I know he simply can’t make the grade no matter how hard he tries.”

Another person remark:

“Sadly much like the scarecrow (on the Wizard of Oz) he doesn’t have a brain. Much like a parrot he repeats everything he hears that he thinks will make good echo politics and gets paid for it. Well I guess it proves that in America even the biggest idiot can grow up to be a news star.”

The Mr. Ed Show however sees it ratings around 400 thousand on any given night. If you would like to know just have small a audience that is, towns like Fresno, Long Beach, California , and, Mesa Arizona has more people living within it borders than people who watch Ed. In comparison Fox News has programing nearly 2 million people nationwide.

What concerns me most about MSNBC, is the viewer is left with a warped, biased impression of what is going on in the world. One can take only so much in a single sitting listening to the delivery of news By Mr. Ed.


NewsBreakers Blog reported the following:

“As if Schultz hadn't raised enough eyebrows among psychotherapists in his audience, he climbed even further over the top in flogging Cheney and Republicans

You see, they hate Social Security. They hate Medicare. It's own your own retirement, own your own Medicare, own your own health care, own your own education, because this is just the best way to do it. They're not American. They are not American. But I guess my question to our wonderful listeners here on the Ed show today is, is Dick Cheney relevant? Yes or no?! And tell me why. So is this the way it's going to be, that the Darth Vader, he's going to come out and stick his head out from that hole he lives in, about every 60 days and do another interview to capture the news cycle for another 24 hours and we've got conflict conversation in the country again?
The guy's a loser! He shot somebody in the face! He doesn't know what the hell he's doing! He's a turncoat, on the American people! Dick Cheney wants you to get hit again for political gain, that's what he wants. I'm convinced of that.”


Segments where his sometimes calls every conservative out, for outrages statements in his psycho talk, but it seems the famous Mr Ed Schultz should listen to himself more often and perhaps Ed should be his feature target in the future.

Well lastly I wanted to report to you that of course the old Mr Ed show I found was popular and at the shows peak "Mr. Ed" commanded 47 percent of the viewing audience in its time slot. But the New Mr Ed show cannot Gardner more than a few hundred thousand. A line in the old Mr Ed theme should be used in the new spin off:

“People yakkity yak a streak and waste your time of day”

But Mr Ed Schultz should follow the next sentence in the theme:

“But Mister Ed will never speak unless he has something to say!”

Eddie boy you need to stop talking, your making a fool of yourself and the ratings sure show it!

Profiling One step closer to Safety?

This past few weeks we have seem a step up search not on the terrorist coming into this country, but the people of this country who fly on our nations airlines. The underwear bomber has frighten the administration to the point where they have decided to punish the American people.

Yes, I am saying that! No matter what the Terrorist are going to get on the planes and they will hijack them. THERE WILL BE PEOPLE KILLED! However, lets think differently concerning this threat against the US and the free world.

Sadly, if we are going to be safe with the flying public in the world, we are going to have to start to do a very nasty word and that is “Profile the people best capable to kill people.” That’s right we need to profile People from the middle east and other Islamic people.
I am sorry, But after allot of thought we need to start being realistic concerning the real world with terrorist doing their best to kill as many people as possible and doing it in a dramatic form.

We need to restrict people coming into this country from these countries, We need to stop immigration from countries who violate our countries nation security, whose immigration polices coming into their countries, that will effect our national security.

We do not need to spend Billions more dollars to make us Safe! we need to "Profile" and we need to do that NOW!

The Battle For Common Sense in Fatherhood!

Many Years ago, I was a divorce Dad trying to get fair visitation with very little success and discovering that how selfish and immature the whole system is. Recently a American Father who was trying to gain custody of his son whose mother who fled to Brazil bought back some very unpleasant memories. The memories of a mother who was out to cause pain to the father and disrupt the child's life in so many ways.

Many Americans were horrified how the Brazilian Court would with hold a father his right to his son, but in reality the American Courts are far more Barbaric than anything foreign, when it comes to Father’s rights. Typically we can see how destructive American courts can be to the family structure and without regard to the extended family and to the child's heritage! Grandparents who after a divorce do not see their grandchildren in any way shape or form.

With two-thirds of divorces initiated by women – thereby immediately casting the man as the "defendant" – and with courts overwhelmingly biased toward mother already, women are held both to be more naturally suited to nurturing and child-rearing, in practice the custody process typically amounts to a "power grab" by which fathers are forcibly separated from their children.

The fathers may have committed no crime; they may in fact be more dedicated than the mother to the marital stability that's in their kids' best interest, but no matter. The mother is rewarded for courageously having taken the "initiative" in the divorce – for having invited, that is, the power of the state to arbitrate in the most private areas of their family life. In other words they the "Mother" destroys the family and is given a big thank you by the powers to be, and becoming a burden to the state through increase welfare and social programs.

This type of barbaric behavior shown thought when dealing in my case everyday when I was trying to get fair visitation and in doing so my son’s mother did her best to lesson my role in the son’s life. My son this year turns 30 years old and I have not seen him in almost 18 years.

I was not invited to his graduation from High school, as I was not included in the normal events fathers who are not divorce. I was treated as a outsider in the very life of my son, from a system incapable in the State of Utah of enforcing the very laws it developed and had it’s judges rule on. And in fact I have not even till recently see a picture of my son! One picture in 18 years?

Child custody is in the stone age in this country and we see it every day with extreme high crime rates. Seven of the eight studies that used nationally representative data, for example, found that children in single-parent or other non-intact family structures were at greater risk of committing criminal or delinquent acts. Also a recent study shows increase of 13% in female-headed households would produce a doubling of the offense rate." (Osgood and Chambers 2000, p. 103)

We also see children of Divorce unable to separate from their mothers and unable to make decisions when it comes to the fathers or in life in general. They are stuck in a threatening situation growing up by the single parent whether it be a single mother or single father. A codependent situation occurs and what the child felt when younger reappears when they become adults.

'Harding of hearts' by parents, make it harder on the child and makes his life far more difficult then it has to be. Not letting the child grow up makes the child incapable of coping with normal situations in life. This I discovered most recently when I asked my son visit me and my family. I discovered his insecurities and I felt sorry for him when it comes to the pressures he most feel.

Sean Goldman the child in question, is not the only child that hasn’t gone through this type of child custody fight and we in this country need to realized that we cannot condemn Brazil’s courts when our justice system is so screw up in the first place. We have done nothing in this country to enforce Child visitation and custody laws.

We have made the mothers little tin plated dictators and not co equals in the development of the children that both parents bought into this world. We should discover that Motherhood isn’t a right to raise children and may be wrong for male children in comparison to female children.

Perhaps a real custody arrangement needs to develop with younger children be raised by the mother in their younger days and when they reach teenagers the fathers take over to finish off their development. Certainly single mothers do not have a good tract record with a huge percentage of children of divorce in prison coming from that type of household.

Alienation is a terrible thing to do to a child, but it seems that we have so many children so screw up by single motherhood that our society needs to rethink child custody arrangements. We see such high crime rates from non custodian fathers and mothers that certainly the unfairness of the situation contributes to it.

I am certainly happy that David Goldman got back his son, perhaps there is hope for his son, but sadly their is no hope for mine. As a adult my poor son, cannot make a decision without the help of his mother. The very sad thing about this is that a child of divorce so often repeats divorce when and if he or she gets marry, suffering through marriage and unable to cope with it complexities in the same matter as the child's parents.

Goldman prevail and got Sean back, but so often disinfected Fathers do give up seeing their children because of the roadblocks bought by both the Courts, and the hatred shown by the Mothers. They become scare by these actions and of course the only ones that suffer are the children, who become scare themselves, never knowing their Fathers and the love that is there.

Some would say how barbaric the Brazilian courts are. I would say, please don't judge them, until we can look at our own system, and get rid of the Barbarism by destructive parents!